Author Topic: New Monster: Your thoughts?  (Read 2919 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jasonbrisbane

  • Senior Adept
  • **
  • Posts: 660
  • OIC Points +0/-0
  • Darkeen's Battlefield - still going strong.
    • Darkeen's Battlefield
New Monster: Your thoughts?
« on: March 28, 2009, 08:38:57 AM »
Hello All,

I've created a new monster for a campaign I'm running.

Pat and others in my campaign, Dont read Further:

(click to show/hide)

Let me know what you think of it... Should it be more difficult? Less difficult? Are the Talents/Abilities too much? Not enough?
--------
Regards,
Jason Brisbane
HARP GM & Freelancer
Author of "The Ruins of Kausur"
http://roleplayingapps.wordpress.com

Offline GMLovlie

  • Senior Adept
  • **
  • Posts: 524
  • OIC Points +0/-0
  • For the future I only hope...
    • Jegergryte's cubic box of stuff
Re: New Monster: Your thoughts?
« Reply #1 on: April 13, 2009, 11:02:12 AM »
Well, its beard, that?s for sure. I like it, although I find some of the abilities a bit confusing, maybe due to my less than adequate reading abilities.

1) fly-by-attack seems to refer to "extra attacks" for moving away, this makes me think of DnD, and I was under the impression that HARP didn?t have free attacks, AoO or extra attacks for moving away from being adjacent... am I wrong? or what exactly are you referring to?

2) How many attacks can it use in any given round? and/or in what combination?

3) The wing buffeting effect, is this in addition to the unbalancing crit? or instead of?

4) The elemental weapon, nice. I gather that no roll is required, just expenditure of PPs or, evil forbid, hit points.

5) The strafing, has to me some odd wording (see above about reading abilities), but I guess what is intended is that it cover 4x the ball area (unscaled ball?) and does a tiny to everyone in the area? Its perhaps the flavoured writing that confuses me.

I don?t envy your players, but I do envy you :evil1:
I find it very powerful, but given that you have designed this for a specific adventure and group of adventurers, I can?t really say if its too powerful. I mean, its Beard, loads of nice abilities/talents, but then, its from the abyss. I mean, all it takes is one lucky shot and its a goner, but you can?t design for such an event, except by giving it fate points (which I?m not sure I would do, or if its allowed by RAW), so barring a 100 pluss another open-ended or two, this would certainly give your players a challenge, I suppose, even kill some of them. I hope they have some magical weapons, at least a dagger or two, that way they will have a chance...

As I don?t have any high level players (as in above 10th level) this creature is too powerful for any of my needs, and my experience with such high level play is limited to none. I think it would work nicely (if such a word can be used).
"What about the future...? We can only hope, we cannot however account for the minutiae of the quanta, as all accidents in an infinite space are inevitable."

Homebrew folder
Ongoing campaign
Inspirational images for my games
My box of stuff

Offline jasonbrisbane

  • Senior Adept
  • **
  • Posts: 660
  • OIC Points +0/-0
  • Darkeen's Battlefield - still going strong.
    • Darkeen's Battlefield
Re: New Monster: Your thoughts?
« Reply #2 on: April 15, 2009, 06:55:42 AM »
1) my players do believe that they should get a free attack for moving away from combat (the disengage from combat rules do not apply to our game). This is not an extra attack but is a talent/combat action that only flying monsters/characters can take.  It replaces any current combat action...

2) The fly-by-attack is one attack, others as the GM thinks appropriate. If it is on the ground thenit doesnt get Two claw attacks (maybe one, but I'd think not. Basically in one round (2 seconds) Id only allow one attack, unless you wanted to give a dragon a combat style?  :D

3) wing buffetting is th unbalance attack, yes

4) Yes, just PP expenditure

5) Yes, instead of a concentrated fire cone over a 10'/20' area, I wanted to give it a chance to do a strafe. The maximum tiny crit allow sit to effectively set fire to an area of bush, ignite a house roof, etc... Or a wagon with PC's in it... etc The size limit is the effect of spreading a concentrated cone over an area twice the size of the original attack.


Actually, this is way less powerful than a Fire dragon (M:AFG) - Level 25.... Yes this is a walk in the path comparatively, so I thought it was a good monster...
--------
Regards,
Jason Brisbane
HARP GM & Freelancer
Author of "The Ruins of Kausur"
http://roleplayingapps.wordpress.com

Offline jasonbrisbane

  • Senior Adept
  • **
  • Posts: 660
  • OIC Points +0/-0
  • Darkeen's Battlefield - still going strong.
    • Darkeen's Battlefield
Re: New Monster: Your thoughts?
« Reply #3 on: April 15, 2009, 07:48:49 AM »
Sorry,

Just to clarify..

The Wing Buffett and Fly-by-attack is intended to be used by ANY huge flying creature with breath weapons, etc... not simply by this one...

Like the Gryphons attacks in cyradon can be used by hippogriffs, etc...
--------
Regards,
Jason Brisbane
HARP GM & Freelancer
Author of "The Ruins of Kausur"
http://roleplayingapps.wordpress.com