Acc of SM:P Warships

Started by markc, February 26, 2011, 10:14:33 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

markc

 I was wondering if anyone had created some larger ships and if they did it buy class or designation what their G's profile was?


So for example from the book SM:P VM Gunboats have G's from aprox. 9-14 and Data Net 1 has Carriers G's at aprox. 2 ISC and 1 Empire.


Thanks
MDC
Bacon Law: A book so good all PC's need to be recreated.
Rule #0: A GM has the right to change any rule in a book to fit their game.
Role Play not Roll Play.
Use a System to tell the story do not let the system play you.

David Johansen

That's a tricky one, in vacuum there's no real reason bigger vessels would be slower or less maneuverable it's just a design feature.  The only real obstacles would be that ships tend to carry maintainance crews while fighters don't and ships are longer ranged / carrying more supplies.

Marc R

Hmm, it depends on if there's a sweat spot in the mechanics of engines. . . if engines get more efficient the larger they are, then you end up with large ships being faster and more maneuverable than small ships. . .if engines have a sweet spot of efficiency at a particular mass, then ships exactly that size will be the fastest.
The Artist Formerly Known As LordMiller

Looking for online Role Play? Try WWW.RealRoleplaying.Com

David Johansen

Yeah but then they just use different engines for different jobs.  Still, there's not really a need for a captital ship to be faster than a fighter.

Marc R

The choice tends to determine the type of sci fi you get. . .with the "bigger = more efficient" you get Star Trek, with "Smaller = More efficient" you get Star Wars.
The Artist Formerly Known As LordMiller

Looking for online Role Play? Try WWW.RealRoleplaying.Com

David Johansen

I've always liked the Star Fleet Battles interpretation where Star Trek the original series is essentially World War I and later periods see fighter and carrier tactics dominating as advances make the efficient drives smaller.