Author Topic: Weapon lenghts  (Read 3281 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Aaron

  • Neophyte
  • *
  • Posts: 49
  • OIC Points +0/-0
Weapon lenghts
« on: December 20, 2007, 11:57:47 PM »
Using battlemaster rules, if for example orc is wielding halberd and and halfling is wielding dagger, if both know of each other, cobat starts at 3-hexes range, because then halfling has to worry about not getting hit, and orc would certainly not want halfling to close to 1-hex range? Or is the combat starting at the optimum range of initiative winner?

Second question: in above situation, how to handle halfling wanting to close to 1-hex range? It's not hold at bay, because orc would want to attack same round, otherwise it's no idea to get long weapons. Any ideas?

Thanks :)
If any spell can be made into potion, how does fireball potion work when someone drinks it?:D

Offline jurasketu

  • Seeker of Wisdom
  • **
  • Posts: 219
  • OIC Points +0/-0
Re: Weapon lenghts
« Reply #1 on: December 21, 2007, 04:50:34 PM »
I think its pretty clear. The Orc gets to make an AoO (Battlemaster rule 3.4) at 2 or 3 hex range and then the Halfling (we assume was making a "Charge" or "Move and Attack") continues up into the Orc's shorts if the AoO hasn't stunned or otherwise disabled the Halfling. To prevent the Halfling from closing requires either "intimidation" or Hold at Bay. If the Orc has friends, one can hold at bay while the others attack using the weapon length advantage.

This is perfectly realistic. In battle, pike/spear formations have the advantage because they can attack with more than one rank of troops and are packed in tight (the second rank can use the weapon reach to get additional attacks in). Pike/spear formations are effective against charging cavalry because the horse is relatively vulnerable in that circumstance. Disciplined open order troops (think Romans vs Greeks) can break ranks move in close and disrupt the pikemen quite effectively (and they did). Once engaged Pikemen are particularly vulnerable to flanking attacks.

So a single person armed with a polearm had better kill or stun the sword armed foe on that first chance or its not going to be good. Open order foot troops would never use polearms for exactly that reason. Cavalry gets to do both - they make first attack using lances and spears, but after initial contact switch to swords/maces since its easy to carry extra weapons aplenty on a horse. Mongol heavy cavalry carried lance, shield, bow, arrows, sword and axe giving them maximum flexibility.

Polearms are for disciplined, armored formations that move as a block on the battlefield. Everybody else uses swords, clubs and axes.

Robin
It is better to be lucky than good, but it is *best* to be both.

When in fear, when in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout!

Offline Marc R

  • Elder Loremaster
  • ****
  • Posts: 13,392
  • OIC Points +0/-0
  • "Don't throw stones, offer alternatives."
    • Looking for Online Roleplay? Try RealRoleplaying
Re: Weapon lenghts
« Reply #2 on: December 22, 2007, 09:40:02 PM »
Another key element of the horse issue. . .they're not stupid enough to charge onto a point. . .horses will almost always balk at throwing themselves onto a spear point. . .generally when they do get impaled, it's because the spearmen thrust, or the second rank of cavelry pushed the first rank of horses onto the points. (The hard part is to have a dense enough hedge of points to stop cavelry, and not break and run from the intimidating charge.)

Disciplined, unbroken spear units essentially cannot be broken by cavelry except by flanking. . . .undisciplined or fleeing footmen get slaughtered by cavelry.
The Artist Formerly Known As LordMiller

Looking for online Role Play? Try WWW.RealRoleplaying.Com