Author Topic: Development Points revisited?  (Read 3235 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline thrud

  • Revered Elder
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,351
  • OIC Points +0/-0
Development Points revisited?
« on: November 17, 2020, 12:21:10 AM »
Since RMC is mostly just a reprint of RM2, all the old companions are still floating around out there.
With each companion new skills are introduced. Naturally there is always the standard "a GM should seriously consider which skills to include in his/her game..."
However, it's quite obvious that there is a massive skill bloat. Still nowhere is this handled in a more definitive logical and structured way. There are some notes and suggested options for adding some additional DPs for purchasing secondary skills, but nothing definitive.
Basically, for every companion the characters are getting spread more and more thin with the increasing number of skills. IMHO, it's not really adding diversification, rather the opposite, unless the issue with development points is handled.

It's been discussed before, but I found no real answer to the question, just vague "we've tried it like this..."

So, it's almost 2021 now (years have passed).
1. How many DPs do your RMC/RM2 characters get?
2. Do you keep separate DPs for primary and secondary skills?

Offline Spectre771

  • Revered Elder
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,385
  • OIC Points +0/-0
Re: Development Points revisited?
« Reply #1 on: November 17, 2020, 05:00:35 AM »
TL-DR: As I have a habit of typing a lot of detail to support my statement...  We've never had a problem with "Too Few DP - Too Many Skills" going all the way back to 1989.  We don't give freebie DP, free skills or skills ranks (Unless it's a reward from a Background Option Table.)



I started playing RM2 back in 89.  In all the years (decades), we've never had an issue with too few DP or too many skills to choose from.  The skills are all optional whether you use extra Companions or not.  Even sticking with the core rules and no Companions at all, the skills are optional.  The players can buy as many or as few extra skills as they want to flesh out their character.  I can say without fear of contradiction, no player I've gamed with has taken Hygiene, Midwifery, or even Donning/Doffing Armour and, as I have all of the RM2 books and I allow every skill offered, the list of "Never Purchased Skills" goes on: Astral Projection, Blind Fighting - Smell, Weapon Buguei, Calisthenics, Portaging, Jesting, Melee Scuffle...

If the skills were not optional and every PC had to buy every skill, then yeah, it's absurd.  What I love about RM2 is that there is a skill for this or that and if you don't have it, you can try at a penalty (save for the few skills listed where one cannot make an attempt without having at least one rank in the skill.)  If one of the players buys a skill that seems odd or out of place, I try to create situations where the PC can use that skill.  Some examples are Architecture, Engineering, Animal Husbandry, Singing, Poetic Improvisation, Public Speaking.  I've had players buy those skills, so I found ways to work them into the game.

I can say that I once rolled up the most mediocre, so-average-he-ruined-the-average, PC and I was still able to make a viable PC who is still in use today.  He's an NPC now as I don't get to game as often as I GM.  He is a Professional Profession and I made him a Blacksmith archetype.  The two highest stats were the Prime Reqs which became automatic 90's and all the other skills were in the low 80's and less.  He had 31 DP (7+6+6+6+6) to spend so I focused on the skills that would make him a good blacksmith.  Weapon of choice was a hammer, good CO to have some lasting power in a battle, Stunned Maneuver, Body Dev, Maneuver in Soft Leather, and a host of skills I thought a Blacksmith would/should have, Basic math, Advanced Math, Weapon Eval, Armour Eval. etc.  Even with 31DP, I had DP leftover at each level and I was looking for "filler skills" to buy just to use up the leftover points.



* - I just looked through all of the PCs I have (I hold onto the players' PCs so they don't get lost in between games.  Sadly, it's happened a couple of times).   I have 20+ character sheets.  One players has 44 DP and another has 42 DP.  The lowest is not my Blacksmith, but a PC with only 29 DP.  The rest are in the 35-39 DP range.  35 being a pretty popular number it seems with 5 PCs at 35 DP.  Some have Skills that go onto a second character sheet because they have so many skills. others have about half a page of skills.  Some went focused on their profession, others went all "Be Prepared."
If discretion is the better valor and
cowardice the better part of judgment,
let's all be heroes and run away!

Offline Ginger McMurray

  • Adept
  • **
  • Posts: 380
  • OIC Points +0/-0
Re: Development Points revisited?
« Reply #2 on: November 17, 2020, 08:22:56 AM »
No extra DPs. We use the basic skill set with a few tweaks to keep it simple.

One example is Sense Ambush: no. Use perception. There's no need for some sort of "spider sense." You see/hear something that lets you know there's an ambush in place.

Another example: meditation is not a hundred different skills. It's meditation: sleep. There's no magical "heal or kill yourself by thinking hard" skill. That's what spells, herbs, and poisons are for (and weapons for suicide).

No advanced mathematics. Players buy mathematics if they want to be full-on mathematicians (nobody has yet). Basic every day math is up to the player to figure out.

I also make sure not to include more than a minor scattering of challenges that don't match a common skill. Maybe nobody is well-trained in it but they'll at least get a roll and can seek out someone who can help and/or pick up a rank or two at their next level.
No pre-written adventure survives contact with the GM.

Offline markc

  • Elder Loremaster
  • ****
  • Posts: 10,697
  • OIC Points +0/-0
Re: Development Points revisited?
« Reply #3 on: November 17, 2020, 02:31:26 PM »
This is a question that I think depends on how the GM plays the game, and here is why.
1) I have talked to some GM's who use very strict interpretations of the skills descriptions, thus players take more skills to be effective.
2) Some GM's use more skills in their game play thus the players use more.
3) Some professions need more skills then others to be player or fit a players idea of playable, an example is an alchemist type PC who needs/wants the following skills crafting (armor, weapon, rings/jewelry, bow, wood, blacksmith, gem cutting, herbalism, chemistry/alchemy, engineering (for building enchantment) (i think the player also went into the desire to have the various resource gathering skills/crafts as well), siege weapon design and crafting), various evaluation skills (some GM's include this in the craft skills some do not), spell lists and various skills for adventuring.
4) Culture and Social Standing can play a huge role in what skills a PC should have.


In a very general way, in RMSS I tend to see players have about 70-80 DP per level when they max out their stats, in RM2 depending on the skill requirements imposed by the GM I tend to think 33-40 would be good.


In the past some people have just given the players max DP per level.


Also I think it would help out if a GM did a quick analysis of what they expect a average PC to have skill wise in various classes for their game. Some classes might need only 20-25 DP to cover the basics and some might need more.
if the GM does this it provides them good info as well as provides players an idea on what the GM thinks an average PC should have in their game for various skills.


MDC     
Bacon Law: A book so good all PC's need to be recreated.
Rule #0: A GM has the right to change any rule in a book to fit their game.
Role Play not Roll Play.
Use a System to tell the story do not let the system play you.

Offline markc

  • Elder Loremaster
  • ****
  • Posts: 10,697
  • OIC Points +0/-0
Re: Development Points revisited?
« Reply #4 on: November 17, 2020, 02:57:26 PM »
One thing I forgot to mention,
In general as you expect semi's tend to be more pressed for DP then pures unless you game is heavily magic then pure arms can also be under DP strain.


MDC
Bacon Law: A book so good all PC's need to be recreated.
Rule #0: A GM has the right to change any rule in a book to fit their game.
Role Play not Roll Play.
Use a System to tell the story do not let the system play you.

Offline PiXeL01

  • Senior Adept
  • **
  • Posts: 631
  • OIC Points +0/-0
  • Seeing things from the top of Mt. Fuji
Re: Development Points revisited?
« Reply #5 on: November 17, 2020, 05:38:19 PM »
In my latest game I set everyone at 60 dev pts per lvl for the first time. We play RC2 with all skills available if wanted.
PiXeL01 - RM2/RMC Fanboy

I think violence in games only causes violence in real life if the person in question has an insufficient mental capacity to deal with the real world in the first place. But, that's more the fault of poor genetics and poorer parenting than it is the fault of a videogame

Offline Jengada

  • Adept
  • **
  • Posts: 409
  • OIC Points +0/-0
Re: Development Points revisited?
« Reply #6 on: November 17, 2020, 05:55:50 PM »
I've homebrewed XP and DP a lot, so if I don't address part of the question, it's probably because my answer would only apply if you used my homebrew.
With respect to skills, I ended up with a 3-tier system.
1 - Primary skills: the core RM2 skills as a start, but I've moved perhaps 4 or 5 later-published "secondary" skills into that category. For example, Pick Pockets is now a primary skill. It should have been there all along.
2 - Select Secondary skills: these are later-published secondary skills that I consider important enough that I will ask for the bonuses, when relevant. This includes things like Tracking, Meditation, and Poison Use. Not having a skill in this group will result in 0 skill-bonus on your roll.
3 - Other Secondary skills: Other, later-published secondary skills. I will never ask for these bonuses, but if a player feels the skill is important to their character, they can buy ranks and then use that bonus. Not having a skill in this group will result in a 0 skill-bonus on your roll.

Starting characters get their normal Adolescence and Apprenticeship DP to spend on primary skill ranks. They also get one sent of half their normal DP, which they can spend on secondary skills at the start. After that, as they go up levels, they have to buy all skills, in any of the 3 groups above, from their normal DP.
We ask the hard questions here, because they keep us too busy to worry about the hard questions in the real world, and we can go with the answers we like the best.

Offline OLF, i.e. Olf Le Fol

  • Revered Elder
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,222
  • OIC Points +0/-0
Re: Development Points revisited?
« Reply #7 on: November 18, 2020, 07:29:11 AM »
1. Primary skills DPs (PDPs) = the basic sum of stats DPs,
2. Secondary skills DPs =  PDPs x 1.625.
The world was then consumed by darkness, and mankind was devoured alive and cast into hell, led by a jubilant 紗羽. She rejoiced in being able to continue serving the gods, thus perpetuating her travels across worlds to destroy them. She looked at her doll and, remembering their promises, told her: "You see, my dear, we succeeded! We've become legends! We've become villains! We've become witches!" She then laughed with a joyful, childlike laughter, just as she kept doing for all of eternity.

Offline Ginger McMurray

  • Adept
  • **
  • Posts: 380
  • OIC Points +0/-0
Re: Development Points revisited?
« Reply #8 on: November 18, 2020, 07:39:05 AM »
1. Primary skills DPs (PDPs) = the basic sum of stats DPs,
2. Secondary skills DPs =  PDPs x 1.625.

Why 1.625?
No pre-written adventure survives contact with the GM.

Offline thrud

  • Revered Elder
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,351
  • OIC Points +0/-0
Re: Development Points revisited?
« Reply #9 on: November 18, 2020, 10:51:36 AM »
@OLF 1.618 would have been obvious, but 1.625?
Maybe I'm reading this wrong, but I get a strong sense that most of the people who have answered my question (much appreciated), share a common trait.
The "other" skills are redundant.
The characters manage perfectly fine without them.
Since players notice they don't need the other skills, they see no point in spending dp on them.
Ergo, there is no shortage of dp...
If GM started actually using the skills in relevant situations, things would very likely change in a hurry.
But as I stated initially, I might be reading this wrong?

Personally I feel the "other" skills are more important than the primary skills for creating a character. They give the character life and depth. They allow you to be creative and go unconventional routes...

So, here's a followup question for those that feel secondary skills are quite redundant. How do you assign profession bonuses? If most secondary skills are redundant and not needed, profession bonuses are just wasted on skills not used, bought, etc.

Offline markc

  • Elder Loremaster
  • ****
  • Posts: 10,697
  • OIC Points +0/-0
Re: Development Points revisited?
« Reply #10 on: November 18, 2020, 01:40:08 PM »
1) A lot of how players spend their DP depend on how the GM runs their game. ie look at the types of games, video game style and or combat, limited, social, etc.
That is why having a GM create a PC for every profession and doing one of each type (basic, mid, everything the GM could want; combos ie fighter types (combat, combat-stealth, combat-missile, etc) goes a long way to giving the GM and thus the players a better idea on how to run the game.


2) I have talked to a few RM2 GM's and had this conversation about hunting and food,
Ways to deal with hunting and food gathering
a)) Need the following skills: hunting(H), H and survival(S) or H, S and Butchery (B) or need H, S, B and cooking(C) or H, C and Animal Lore (AL) or some combination of the above.
You can see in one game you just need 1 skill Hunting to find game and dress the meat and then cook it on the other end you need quite a few skills to do the same thing.
b) Again this was RM2 GM's describing their various game style. I do not remember how each of them did secondary skills(SS) but I would guess that there were different ways to calculate DP's for SS based on their style.
c) Why so different? From memory they(some) were trying to have players be less hyper specialized and more rounded as that was a "thing" they were trying to avoid from other systems.


So in general for your game I would,
1) Define/list what skills average/basic people should have, note not specialized or hyper specialized
2) Do the same for adventures, ie add or subtract skills to list
3) Do the same for each profession, ie add or subtract skills to list
4) Look at the DP values for each above and see what the value or values need to be.
5) Do the same analysis for each profession level bonuses.


Unfortunately there is no simple answer to your question and in fact RM2's less DP can make it harder in some ways then in RMSS/FRP.


MDC


   


 
Bacon Law: A book so good all PC's need to be recreated.
Rule #0: A GM has the right to change any rule in a book to fit their game.
Role Play not Roll Play.
Use a System to tell the story do not let the system play you.

Offline Ginger McMurray

  • Adept
  • **
  • Posts: 380
  • OIC Points +0/-0
Re: Development Points revisited?
« Reply #11 on: November 18, 2020, 02:05:48 PM »

So, here's a followup question for those that feel secondary skills are quite redundant. How do you assign profession bonuses? If most secondary skills are redundant and not needed, profession bonuses are just wasted on skills not used, bought, etc.

RM2 level bonuses are per category. There are no redundant categories, only redundant skills inside them.
No pre-written adventure survives contact with the GM.

Offline thrud

  • Revered Elder
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,351
  • OIC Points +0/-0
Re: Development Points revisited?
« Reply #12 on: November 18, 2020, 02:09:07 PM »
No worries, I have actually got a much better idea now, than before this thread.

Offline thrud

  • Revered Elder
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,351
  • OIC Points +0/-0
Re: Development Points revisited?
« Reply #13 on: November 18, 2020, 02:10:43 PM »
About level bonuses, I was mainly thinking of professions introduced after rc2.

Offline markc

  • Elder Loremaster
  • ****
  • Posts: 10,697
  • OIC Points +0/-0
Re: Development Points revisited?
« Reply #14 on: November 18, 2020, 03:15:26 PM »
General;
Professions RoCo2+: IIRC these professions were some of the most popular and the most unbalanced in terms of the base game.


Example from about 6-10 years ago:
I think an example from about 6-10 years ago might help, a group posted on the boards that they wanted to be able to buy 1 weapon skill and then pay some DP or something to be able to take all of the ranks in that weapon and put it in another weapon. Why/ Because the PC found a new weapon(s) that was not of the type the could use and the players wanted to be the best in that weapon.
When I suggested that they spend Dp or more then one weapon at the start of the game they said their was not enough DP to do this. IIRC this was not a semi-arms issue it was a pure-arms profession issue and the fact they (in my opinion and is a valid way to play games) were trying to hyper-specialize and or min-max to the extreme.


With RM2 and to some extent RMSS+, I have found it takes different amount of DP to be effective PC depending on game style and some professions fall behind the balance curve quickly in some play styles.


MDC 
Bacon Law: A book so good all PC's need to be recreated.
Rule #0: A GM has the right to change any rule in a book to fit their game.
Role Play not Roll Play.
Use a System to tell the story do not let the system play you.

Offline Spectre771

  • Revered Elder
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,385
  • OIC Points +0/-0
Re: Development Points revisited?
« Reply #15 on: November 19, 2020, 07:21:24 AM »

Example from about 6-10 years ago:
I think an example from about 6-10 years ago might help, a group posted on the boards that they wanted to be able to buy 1 weapon skill and then pay some DP or something to be able to take all of the ranks in that weapon and put it in another weapon. Why/ Because the PC found a new weapon(s) that was not of the type the could use and the players wanted to be the best in that weapon.

A later Companion introduced Weapon Categories that we adopted.  1H Slashing, 2H Slashing, 1H Crush, 2H Crush, etc.  This allowed the PCs to use a fancy new scimitar they found on the adventure instead of being stuck with their broadsword until they leveled up and bought ranks in Scimitar.  That definitely helped with the DP issue once the campaign was underway. 
If discretion is the better valor and
cowardice the better part of judgment,
let's all be heroes and run away!

Offline thrud

  • Revered Elder
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,351
  • OIC Points +0/-0
Re: Development Points revisited?
« Reply #16 on: November 19, 2020, 07:53:07 AM »
Similar skill as a concept was already floating around in CHL as an option. It was fleshed out inrc2 I think. It makes weapon categories somewhat redundant.

Offline Ginger McMurray

  • Adept
  • **
  • Posts: 380
  • OIC Points +0/-0
Re: Development Points revisited?
« Reply #17 on: November 19, 2020, 09:03:18 AM »
We never had problems with RM2 fighters using multiple weapons. Their costs were cheap enough that you could typically afford to have one primary weapon which always got 2 ranks and several backup weapons with one or more ranks per level. The most common build involved a one-handed weapon, off-hand shield bash, thrown with your main hand weapon, and a long range weapon for when thrown just won't cut it.

We used similar weapon skills as well but it didn't come into play that often. If a weapon was found that didn't match something people used it was either sold (and a new item crafted) or someone started putting points and half-levels into it. It doesn't take a pure fighter long to get 10 ranks in a weapon if they focus heavily on it for a couple of levels and this would typically only happen if you find a really beefy weapon (i.e. holy, slaying, etc.) and those tend to have higher bonuses to mitigate lower skill.

You suffer a little in other skill categories but if you want to be more generalized then you play a rogue or thief instead.
No pre-written adventure survives contact with the GM.

Offline OLF, i.e. Olf Le Fol

  • Revered Elder
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,222
  • OIC Points +0/-0
Re: Development Points revisited?
« Reply #18 on: November 19, 2020, 09:53:22 AM »
Why 1.625?
Rounding, there are about 1.625 more (later) skills than how many primary skills there were in Ch&CL, taking into account all companions (RoCo. II, of course, but there are many in the AC as well, and some in the RoCo. IV and V, etc.)

Personally I feel the "other" skills are more important than the primary skills for creating a character. They give the character life and depth.
It's the main reason why I give my NPCs secondary skills and push my players to do the same. People don't only learn things because they'll need them to survive: one may just learn singing because one enjoys singing, or cooking because one likes cooking. What secondary skill a character soever knows defines the kind of person he is. I have hundreds of NPCs; though they all have a detailed background story and I recall most of them for what they are, reading what skills they have other than the mandatory "adventuring" ones allows me to remember what kind of person they are. A fighter whose secondary skills are athletic games, pole vaulting and sprinting is not the same as another who has instead horticulture, painting and tactical games!
It's similar to RL, really. If you go to an office and talk to three different clerks, the skills they have that are not necessary for their job is what teaches the most about them as persons: you'd learn more about their personality when knowing that one knows carpentry, the other is an expert at fishing whilst the last knows computer programming!
The world was then consumed by darkness, and mankind was devoured alive and cast into hell, led by a jubilant 紗羽. She rejoiced in being able to continue serving the gods, thus perpetuating her travels across worlds to destroy them. She looked at her doll and, remembering their promises, told her: "You see, my dear, we succeeded! We've become legends! We've become villains! We've become witches!" She then laughed with a joyful, childlike laughter, just as she kept doing for all of eternity.

Offline markc

  • Elder Loremaster
  • ****
  • Posts: 10,697
  • OIC Points +0/-0
Re: Development Points revisited?
« Reply #19 on: November 19, 2020, 01:53:44 PM »
I agree that PC's should spend DP on more then one weapon and IIRC I provided this idea at the time but it seemed the group wanted to hyper specialize and be able to switch one weapon (maybe a trial balloon for doing it with other skills) for another for a simple cost of some sort.
Maybe they were trolling also or looking to build their own game (PnP, ComAid or Comp).


Weapon categories, I also mentioned this but it cost more DP to buy a category then a single weapon.


Note on Level Bonuses:
I played a little MERP and RM back in the mid 80s but most of the people I knew who played RM in the 95-00 age used assigned level bonuses (I may have the name wrong).
That is were a player has a set amount of plusses to assign per level to areas and a max amount they can assign to an area. 


IMHO, the place level bonus idea is superior then fixed and in same cases I can see a GM assigning them or some of them to prevent strangeness. That would be spending a whole level in a library doing puzzles and thought stuff and getting level bonuses in combat areas.


MDC
Bacon Law: A book so good all PC's need to be recreated.
Rule #0: A GM has the right to change any rule in a book to fit their game.
Role Play not Roll Play.
Use a System to tell the story do not let the system play you.