...your basic understanding of how AI generated images are done is wrong.
You don't think they're generated using a combination of examples of many pieces of art... just like most living artists do?
My reply #33 and #36 should have answered this already.
You're going to need to be more specific. Both AI and human artists use existing art to generate derivative art from.
AI generators use and merge pre-existing images, they can never in the near future learn to paint something on their own without relying on scraped databases of images and photos made by humans, scraped and used without said artists consent.
How does this differ from a human basing their new art on past art?
We're not arguing about inspiration. I think there is where you get this wrong. Programs can't be inspired, they act from programmed algorithms, in this case AI image generators copy/cut/paste human artist's works put very simple, to generate new images. AI generators don't paint images pixel by pixel.
Firstly, as I said in reply to that, we are actually partially arguing about inspiration (via the user inputting parameters), but ignoring that aspect of those posts...
Are you implying something partially copied by hand is okay but something partially copied digitally is not?