I'm sure we discussed it somewhere, but can't find it. I think it came down to two things:

1) The short sword is based on earlier period short swords and the arming sword is based on later period arming swords, because by the time metallurgy was good enough that arming swords were practical, there was a lot less point in making a short sword. This is an inherent problem for the whole assortment of weapons, we pretend everything co-exists at the same moment, and consequently there are different hidden assumptions about technology for different items. By the time you are making arming swords, you could make a better short sword.

2) Even with that said, I think the short sword is probably a bit too heavy.

So between those two things, I think taking a pound off the short sword is not unreasonable. If you wanted, you could also up the price a few silver to distinguish the quality. But this is not rules as written, you'll have to convince your GM.

This is going to sound like a question which might have been asked before but is there a specific reason why a short sword is heavier than an arming sword? Even if the Short sword does attacks one step smaller. I see that it does have a bit more strength against breakage but overall is a lot smaller.

Any thoughts on this? I'm trying to find out why it would be heavier? Our Rogue really needs the 0.5 lb...

buy levetiracetam
 
 
<a href="https://canadapharmacy-usa.net/drug/symbicort/">symbicort without prescription</a>

Sizzling Hot aplikacja - graj w dowolnym miejscu!
 
Plusy:
 
- iOS - dostępna wszędzie
- Wpłaty BLIK - 3 sekundy
- Sizzling Hot 777 w jednej app
- Turnieje - graj na żywo
- Dodatkowe promocje
 
Pobierz: Sizzling Hot 777 jackpot turniej
 
Szczegóły: jak grać w Sizzling Hot -> link
 
Ustaw limity! Odpowiedzialna gra limity bankroll sloty -> link

Yeah, I like SMC0, SMC1, and SMC2.

If you adhere to what was used officially at the time, it would be SpaMCo. Easier to pronounce, but I always thought it was a bit clumsy.

There were actually three Spacemaster Companions, though, and Companion I was not the same as the original Companion. Based on that, we might use:

SMC (or SMC0?)
SMC1
SMC2

Sizzling Hot aplikacja - zagraj na telefonie!
 
Korzyści:
 
- iOS - dostępna wszędzie
- Płatności BLIK - 3 sekundy
- Wszystkie wersje w jednej app
- Hot Race turniej - graj na żywo
- Dodatkowe promocje
 
Download: Sizzling Hot 777
 
Więcej info: jak grać w Sizzling Hot -> link
 
Graj odpowiedzialnie! Odpowiedzialna gra limity bankroll sloty -> link

Szukasz gdzie legalnie grać?
 
Najlepsze opcje:
 
- Legalne
- Płatności BLIK - natychmiastowe BLIK
- Promocje: darmowe spiny
- Cashout w dobę
 
TOP kasyn: gdzie grać Sizzling Hot -> link
 
Mobilnie: najlepsze aplikacje kasynowe Sizzling Hot -> link
 
Graj na: Sizzling Hot 777 teraz!

Quote from: wibobm on February 07, 2026, 01:02:07 PMFell Beasts have light-boned talent.  Their HP should be 621 vs. 828 as a result.

I think several (if not all) creatures with this talent are impacted.

Fell Beasts have light-boned talent.  Their HP should be 621 vs. 828 as a result.