Thanks Jeff.
I would like to say I do not mind the attack tables as they are. I have played RM for many, many years now and am as dedicated to the system as ever. I feel it is the best rpg I have played.
That said, there is always room for improvement. In my play today, I try to refer to rule books and charts as little as I have to. Certainly, my ideas about changing Arms Law are deeply biased by that preference.
I have converted scores of people to RM over the years. I know the power of the crit tables and how much fun they are. I also know that the attack tables are, in general, intimidating. It LOOKS like a lot to learn. Me, I have six copies of Arms Law. I sold my 1st edition grey tables a while back, or I would have every version of Arms Law available. I will be content with using Arms Law the rest of my gaming life. That said, I would like to see changes. Change requires a willingness to think outside the box. IMO, who better that experienced RM GM's to pump for perceptions and ideas on possible changes?