I'm just copying them over from their scattered sources into places where people can find them. Over the years I've noticed a number of people quote one of these from their varied sources to clear up a point. . . sometimes with snarky comments. . .I recall "Before posting a thread like this, why don't you bother to take a couple minutes to check the errata first <url>?" being one gem of polite discourse. . . .well, now you don't need to know the 50 ICE related sites well enough to know where all the errata is hidden, it's all in one place.
If they were labled by specific book, I followed the format I found already in place of one thread per book. . .for the non specific book marked stuff I just copied it over into a giant thread. . .I'm not feeling to eager at the moment to sift them out to book by book entries after all that copying. . .but if anyone wants to say "Errata post X goes to book Y" I will get it moved.
The question is akin to walking up to someone who just pulled 100 unmarked boxes out of the basement, pulled all the dusty books out of them, and put them on shelves, looking around, and going "How many books do we need?". . .I'm fairly thick skinned, I suspect anyone else would bite your head off.
Nobody is forcing anyone to read anything, like any other thread on the board, feel free to just ignore it, click the "Mark as read" if it doesn't appeal to you. . .the people it does appeal to will read them. . .as usual YMMV.
