Recent Posts

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 ... 10
11
Rolemaster / Re: Rolemaster Unified art: what happened?
« Last post by nash on Today at 10:23:16 AM »
Quote from: Thot on Today at 12:03:24 AM
This whole "hire humans!!" movement will die anyway. We might as well get the best results now rather than later.

Let's get these humans back to producing the good stuff... washing dishes, mining coal... none of this creative endeavours!  Leave that to the experts - the machines!

FWIW: I have a simple rule when it comes to AI artwork in creative products:  Absolutely not.   
Use it at your table for personal stuff (AI icons for characters in a game... sure).
12
Rolemaster / Re: Rolemaster Unified art: what happened?
« Last post by 5th Knight of Xar on Today at 02:03:37 AM »
Quote from: Thot on Today at 12:03:24 AM
I sometimes think it might be worth it to create my own AI art, and place it on the art that actually is in the book.

This whole "hire humans!!" movement will die anyway. We might as well get the best results now rather than later.

It's your purchased copy, nobody is stopping you.

 In the end it's up to ICE how they go about with their own products.
13
Rolemaster / Re: Rolemaster Unified art: what happened?
« Last post by Thot on Today at 12:03:24 AM »
I sometimes think it might be worth it to create my own AI art, and place it on the art that actually is in the book.

This whole "hire humans!!" movement will die anyway. We might as well get the best results now rather than later.
14
RMC/RM2 / Re: New RM Classic/RM2 Actual Play Campaign - "Twilight of the Old Order"
« Last post by C.Tozer on May 01, 2024, 04:10:09 PM »
What is your best tip for making taverns more interesting in TTRPGs?

Check out at a date gone wrong in our new Rolemaster Actual Play episode: Twilight (E136) & Hero (E113) "Three's a crowd”
 
https://youtu.be/zCxg4RD4J0o?si=zVmZgG03Y2zrjiTA&t=2

#rolemaster #twilightoftheoldorder #rolemasteractualplay
15
ICE News and Discussion / Re: Director's Briefing - April 2024
« Last post by DavidKlecker on May 01, 2024, 01:36:08 PM »
I'll put this here in case it helps... AutoHARP3 Harp Fantasy is done and I have the executables to give to be published. :)
16
Order of the Iron Crown / Re: Nationalities of ICE gamers
« Last post by Justin on April 30, 2024, 09:38:30 AM »
A follow-up poll of comfortable languages would be cool. And useful if anyone is ever going to localize a product, whether official or fan-made.
17
RMSS/FRP / Re: Stun Removal at -50?
« Last post by EltonJ on April 29, 2024, 04:20:13 PM »
Quote from: Hurin on April 29, 2024, 04:03:20 PM
I think the -50/-75 to movement was added because originally (RM2), movement was the only action (other than parrying at half OB) allowed when stunned. All other actions were forbidden.

It might also be helpful to note that the original description of the Stunned Maneuvering skill in RM Companion 2 specified a -10 penalty to the skill roll per cumulative round of stun. Companion 2 also (confusingly) had its own Static Action table which noted both the -10/round penalty and gave additional difficulty penalties for number of rounds of stun accrued. E.g. 2 rounds of stun made the base Static Action manuever a Hard (-10) check. I say this his confusing because these difficulty levels don't line up with the simple -10/round that is mentioned both in the verbal description of the skill and in this very chart I am referencing on p. 92 of Companion 2.

Let me check that, I happen to have a copy of RM Companion II.

Well, Hurin is right.  At least for the original description of the skill.
18
RMSS/FRP / Re: Stun Removal at -50?
« Last post by Hurin on April 29, 2024, 04:03:20 PM »
I think the -50/-75 to movement was added because originally (RM2), movement was the only action (other than parrying at half OB) allowed when stunned. All other actions were forbidden.

It might also be helpful to note that the original description of the Stunned Maneuvering skill in RM Companion 2 specified a -10 penalty to the skill roll per cumulative round of stun. Companion 2 also (confusingly) had its own Static Action table which noted both the -10/round penalty and gave additional difficulty penalties for number of rounds of stun accrued. E.g. 2 rounds of stun made the base Static Action manuever a Hard (-10) check. I say this his confusing because these difficulty levels don't line up with the simple -10/round that is mentioned both in the verbal description of the skill and in this very chart I am referencing on p. 92 of Companion 2.
19
RMSS/FRP / Re: Q: Warcraft Orcs
« Last post by EltonJ on April 29, 2024, 01:16:05 PM »
Quote from: MisterK on April 29, 2024, 12:50:45 PM
Quote from: EltonJ on April 29, 2024, 11:33:28 AM
Actually, I want the orcs to be like World of Warcraft orcs.  Since they are like "real" orcs. (there are some differences between a real orc and a WoW orc.)
I hate to break it to you, but orcs aren't "real" :)

Why did I put "real" in quotes?  ;D
20
RMSS/FRP / Re: Q: Warcraft Orcs
« Last post by MisterK on April 29, 2024, 12:50:45 PM »
Quote from: EltonJ on April 29, 2024, 11:33:28 AM
Actually, I want the orcs to be like World of Warcraft orcs.  Since they are like "real" orcs. (there are some differences between a real orc and a WoW orc.)
I hate to break it to you, but orcs aren't "real" :)
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 ... 10