I just don't think Cay would answer.
Opinions vary.
A god not answering reasonable questions from his followers is not mine.
If it was that easy as to make a small sacrifice and ask an important question, ...
Who said anything about 'making a simple sacrifice'?
I was (and am) referring to the spells that specifically say such things as:
"Caster receives (usually from his patron deity) a "yes" or "no" answer to a question on a single topic."
That is, in the case of 'asking a god', I am referring to a spell user using the spells that allow such information gathering; i.e. the individual that is asking the questions is the one directly getting the answers (none of this "my sister has a friend who knows a guy whose cousin once heard that ..." type stuff; and none of the HS type 'Hey Joe, can you ask Mary if ..." stuff either).
There are numerous other such spells that allow one to directly gather information [themselves] relatively easily, and from a variety of sources (i.e. just not 'patron deity' or 'otherworldly servants of patron deity').
A better educated society tends to view itself as enlightened. Sure Gods exist, but we don't need them.
This is also an Earth oriented answer.
On Earth, yes the educated say 'we do not need that mumbo jumbo'.
But in a place where 'that mumbo jumbo'
is not 'mumbo jumbo' but is, in fact,
real power (look at the powers a channeling spell user can get), the educated (and powerful) do not say:
"Sure Gods exist, but we don't need them."
What they say instead is something more like:
"Even the powerful need friends in high places."
or they say:
"Even the powerful must respect the gods."
or they say:
"I need to get a piece of that!"
or they say:
"Even the lowly are not afraid when they have the power of a god with them."
As for all of those 'what if' questions, that strikes me as putting the cart before the horse.
That is, that what has happened is different from what those questions imply should have happened prove nothing - IMO, all they really do is muddy the waters.
'Oh, those are not real gods. If they were real gods they would not let Uncle Joe suffer like that.'
IMO, a nonsensical POV.
Similarly:
Faith is fickle.
Another Earth-centric comment.
Yes, perhaps, maybe, there might, somewhere, be a few that willy-nilly switch from one religion to another.
But, again, that is more characteristic of the modern times of this world (Earth) where one cannot go to the local church and
see on a daily basis actual, indisputable 'god power' at work (and where, today, one does not get killed for being a pagan, heathen or heretic; i.e. where one does not get killed for openly disagreeing with the local religion - although that does happen in this day and age here on Earth).
Religious pluralism has happened throughout Earth's history but it was seldom the rule and even when other religions were tolerated, they were often persecuted or otherwise had sever limits placed on them by society.
Yeah, there are some non-channeling spell users who may try to 'prove' this claim or that claim by using their magic.
But those are the exception, not the rule.
Even in this world (Earth), where there are no blatant, god-given powers that can be repeatedly and routinely demonstrated under any circumstances, religious organizations throughout history made a very concerted and deliberate effort to hold on to their power.
They punish, exile, and even kill those who speak out against their religion and do worse to those who try and switch to (or start) another religion.
And that is here (on Earth), where they have nothing but words and the might of arms to do that.
Now imagine a world like Kulthea where the church has real power, where casting spells like 'Stunning' only require a 5th level follower.
If the religions on Kulthea were anything like those on Earth (perhaps not a valid assertion), and you know how Earth's religions have (for most of Earth's history) dealt with 'unbelievers', just how do you think the religions of Kulthea would deal with such individuals?
As for some of those questions, (e.g. Why didn't the People turn to Cay and ask "Who is the real Emperor?"), the deity they question may not have an answer ("I really don't care who is emperor - real or otherwise"), or a straight answer ("It is whoever you want it to be") or may not be able to give a direct answer (imagine Cay, Kuor and Phaon all backing different heirs to the throne - would they fight amongst themselves? would they force their followers to fight it out? or would they 'agree to disagree' and let actions take whatever course they take with little, if any, involvement by them? just how they agreed to work out their differences would heavily influence the answer given).
Yes - it seems we have a large difference of opinion.
IMO, you are basing 'what is what' on an Earth model, which is an unsound model for Kulthea (in part for the reasons I have outlined above; though there are many other reasons; e.g. long lived individuals are routine on Kulthea and non-existent on Earth; e.g. see below for a time line comparison).
On Kulthea, it can be very easy to find answers to 'questions of the ages' (a separate thread could be started listing all the myriad ways).
On Earth, it can be very difficult to find definitive answer to any question whose answer is based in events of a few hundred years ago, let alone a few thousand years ago.
Comparing current Earth time (21st century) to 'current' Kulthea time (c. 6050s Third Era):
- on Earth, written language developed *well after* the end of the Wars of Dominion
- on Earth, wide-spread domestication of animals would have happened *during* the Second Era (and initial domestication only *slightly* before the start of the Second Era)
- on Earth, cultivation (i.e. agriculture) may not even date back to *before* the start of the Second Era
- etc. etc.
Earth to Kulthea is a very tempting 'apples to pears' comparison - one could easily imagine lots of similarities and generally look past the [minor?] differences.
But it is more like a 'lemonade to motor oil' comparison - yeah, they are both liquids but one must be very, very careful beyond that.
DonMoody
P.S. And no, I do not think a god answering reasonable questions from his followers who use the spells that allow them to petition for such answers is problematic in any way.
Not in the way the myriad questions implied.
And certainly not in any way make the game less fun (i.e. in my opinion, the view of "That would take all the fun out of the game too" is at best hyperbole).